Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione vs Jumilla Monastrell

How Chianti Classico Gran Selezione and Jumilla Monastrell differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more acidity; Jumilla Monastrell has more spice; Jumilla Monastrell has more alcohol.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something fresher and more acidic, more savoury, fresher.

Choose

Jumilla Monastrell

Choose Jumilla Monastrell if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Jumilla Monastrell is spicier: medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Jumilla Monastrell is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico Gran SelezioneJumilla Monastrell
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espressoblackberry, plum, earth, game, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more