Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione vs Saperavi

How Chianti Classico Gran Selezione and Saperavi differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Saperavi has more spice; Saperavi has more sweetness; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more oak influence.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something more oaky, more savoury, earthier.

Choose

Saperavi

Choose Saperavi if you want something spicier, sweeter.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Saperavitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Saperavi is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Saperavi is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Saperavitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico Gran SelezioneSaperavi
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espressodamson, sour plum, blackcurrant, liquorice, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more