Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione vs Super Tuscan

How Chianti Classico Gran Selezione and Super Tuscan differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione and Super Tuscan are both made from Sangiovese, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more earthy character; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more savoury character; Super Tuscan has more herbal / green character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something earthier, more savoury, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Super Tuscan

Choose Super Tuscan if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Super Tuscanlow (1/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Super Tuscantypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Super Tuscan is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico Gran SelezioneSuper Tuscan
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espressoblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, mint, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more