Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Chianti Classico Gran Selezione and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more earthy character; Uruguayan Tannat has more spice; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more acidity.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something spicier, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico Gran SelezioneUruguayan Tannat
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espressoblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more