Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Riserva vs Morgon

How Chianti Classico Riserva and Morgon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chianti Classico Riserva has more savoury character; Chianti Classico Riserva has more herbal / green character; Chianti Classico Riserva has more acidity.

Choose

Chianti Classico Riserva

Choose Chianti Classico Riserva if you want something more savoury, more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Morgon

Choose Morgon if you want something fruitier, more aromatic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Morgontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more savoury: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Morgonlow (1/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Morgontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Morgon is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Chianti Classico Riservamedium (3/5)
Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Morgon is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Spice: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico RiservaMorgon
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, balsamicblack cherry, kirsch, violet, earth, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more