Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Riserva vs New Zealand Pinot Noir

How Chianti Classico Riserva and New Zealand Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: New Zealand Pinot Noir has more fruit intensity; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more spice; Chianti Classico Riserva has more acidity.

Choose

Chianti Classico Riserva

Choose Chianti Classico Riserva if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, more savoury.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something fruitier, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classico Riservalow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico RiservaNew Zealand Pinot Noir
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, balsamicdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clove

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more