Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico vs Brunello di Montalcino

Both are Sangiovese from Tuscany — what does the extra money buy?

The short answer

Chianti Classico and Brunello di Montalcino are both made from Sangiovese, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Chianti Classico has more herbal / green character; Brunello di Montalcino has more spice; Brunello di Montalcino has more tannin.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Chianti Classico

Choose Chianti Classico if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Brunello di Montalcino

Choose Brunello di Montalcino if you want something spicier, more tannic and structured, fruitier.

Worth knowing

Brunello must be 100% Sangiovese and cannot be released until the fifth year after harvest. Montalcino is also warmer and drier than Chianti Classico, so the fruit ripens more fully. The result is denser and longer-lived — but Chianti Classico is the more versatile food wine, and a good one beats an indifferent Brunello comfortably.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Brunello di Montalcinolow (1/5)

Chianti Classico is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classicolow (1/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chianti Classicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chianti Classicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Brunello di Montalcinotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Brunello di Montalcino is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti ClassicoBrunello di Montalcino
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried oregano, leather, balsamicblack cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more