Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti vs Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

How Chianti and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Chianti and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Chianti has more acidity; Chianti has more herbal / green character; Chianti has more earthy character.

Choose

Chianti

Choose Chianti if you want something fresher and more acidic, more herbal and green, earthier.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chiantitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Chianti is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Chianti is earthier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chiantitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Chianti is fresher: high against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChiantiMontepulciano d’Abruzzo
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried herbs, red plum, leatherblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more