Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti vs New Zealand Pinot Noir

How Chianti and New Zealand Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: New Zealand Pinot Noir has more fruit intensity; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more spice; Chianti has more acidity.

Choose

Chianti

Choose Chianti if you want something fresher and more acidic, fresher.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something fruitier, spicier, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chiantilow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chiantitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chiantitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chiantitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionChiantiNew Zealand Pinot Noir
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried herbs, red plum, leatherdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clove

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more