Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti vs Hawke’s Bay Syrah

How Chianti and Hawke’s Bay Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more spice; Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more floral character; Chianti has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Chianti

Choose Chianti if you want something more herbal and green, earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something spicier, more floral, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chiantilow (1/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Chiantilow (1/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)

Chianti is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)

Chianti is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chiantitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionChiantiHawke’s Bay Syrah
Spicelow (1/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried herbs, red plum, leatherblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plum

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more