Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti vs Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

How Chianti and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Chianti and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano are both made from Sangiovese, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Chianti has more herbal / green character; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more tannin; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more body.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Chianti

Choose Chianti if you want something more herbal and green, fresher.

Choose

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

Choose Vino Nobile di Montepulciano if you want something more tannic and structured, fuller and richer, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Chianti is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chiantitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chiantitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChiantiVino Nobile di Montepulciano
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried herbs, red plum, leathersour cherry, plum, dried herbs, leather, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more