Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti vs Naoussa Xinomavro

How Chianti and Naoussa Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Naoussa Xinomavro has more tannin; Naoussa Xinomavro has more floral character; Chianti has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Chianti

Choose Chianti if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Naoussa Xinomavro

Choose Naoussa Xinomavro if you want something more tannic and structured, more floral, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Chiantilow (1/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Chianti is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chiantitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Chiantitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chiantitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChiantiNaoussa Xinomavro
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, tomato leaf, dried herbs, red plum, leathersun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more