Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore vs Moscato d’Asti

How Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore and Moscato d’Asti differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore and Moscato d’Asti come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Moscato d’Asti has more sweetness; Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has more alcohol; Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has more body.

Choose

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore

Choose Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Choose

Moscato d’Asti

Choose Moscato d’Asti if you want something sweeter, fruitier, more aromatic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superioretypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Moscato d’Astitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Moscato d’Asti is sweeter: medium-plus against low-medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superioretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Moscato d’Astilow (1/5)

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore is stronger and warmer: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superioretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Moscato d’Astitypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore is fuller and richer: medium against low-medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superioretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Moscato d’Astitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Moscato d’Asti is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superioretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Moscato d’Astitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Moscato d’Asti is more aromatic: high against medium-plus.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Conegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superioretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Moscato d’Astitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Moscato d’Asti is more floral: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both low.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionConegliano Valdobbiadene Prosecco SuperioreMoscato d’Asti
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tanninlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Oak influencelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low-medium (2/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at6–9°C6–8°C
Typical flavourswhite peach, pear, acacia blossom, green apple, almondgrape, orange blossom, peach, elderflower, honeysuckle

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more