Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon vs Dalmatian Plavac Mali

How Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon and Dalmatian Plavac Mali differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Dalmatian Plavac Mali has more spice; Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fresher, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Dalmatian Plavac Mali

Choose Dalmatian Plavac Mali if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malilow (1/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCoonawarra Cabernet SauvignonDalmatian Plavac Mali
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourscassis, mint, eucalyptus, blackcurrant leaf, cedarblackberry, dried fig, carob, black pepper, sea salt

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more