Comparison
Dalmatian Plavac Mali vs Primitivo di Manduria
How Dalmatian Plavac Mali and Primitivo di Manduria differ, dimension by dimension.
The short answer
The main differences: Dalmatian Plavac Mali has more savoury character; Primitivo di Manduria has more sweetness.
Where they genuinely differ
Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.
Savoury character
Clear differenceNon-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.
Dalmatian Plavac Mali is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.
Sweetness
Clear differencePerceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.
Primitivo di Manduria is sweeter: low-medium against low.
Where they are much the same
Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.
- Acidity: Similar — both medium.
- Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
- Alcohol: Similar — both high.
- Body: Similar — both high.
- Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
Full side by side
| Dimension | Dalmatian Plavac Mali | Primitivo di Manduria |
|---|---|---|
| Savoury character | typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5) | low-medium (2/5) |
| Sweetness | low (1/5) | typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5) |
| Acidity | typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5) | typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5) |
| Tannin | typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5) | typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5) |
| Alcohol | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) |
| Body | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) |
| Fruit intensity | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) |
| Aromatic intensity | medium (3/5) | medium (3/5) |
| Oak influence | typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5) | typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5) |
| Floral character | low (1/5) | low (1/5) |
| Herbal / green character | low (1/5) | low (1/5) |
| Spice | typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5) | typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5) |
| Earthy character | low (1/5) | low (1/5) |
| Perceived freshness | typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5) | typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5) |
| Carbonation | low (1/5) | low (1/5) |
| Texture | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) | typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5) |
| Serve at | 16–18°C | 16–18°C |
| Typical flavours | blackberry, dried fig, carob, black pepper, sea salt | dried fig, blackberry, black cherry, chocolate, liquorice |
Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.