Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Dalmatian Plavac Mali vs Washington Syrah

How Dalmatian Plavac Mali and Washington Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Washington Syrah has more earthy character; Washington Syrah has more floral character; Washington Syrah has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Dalmatian Plavac Mali

Choose Dalmatian Plavac Mali if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something earthier, more floral, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Dalmatian Plavac Malilow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Dalmatian Plavac Malilow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionDalmatian Plavac MaliWashington Syrah
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, dried fig, carob, black pepper, sea saltblackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more