Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Etna Rosso vs Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

How Etna Rosso and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Etna Rosso and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Etna Rosso has more earthy character; Etna Rosso has more acidity; Etna Rosso has more floral character.

Choose

Etna Rosso

Choose Etna Rosso if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more floral.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Etna Rossotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Etna Rosso is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Etna Rossotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Etna Rosso is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Etna Rosso is more floral: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Etna Rossotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Etna Rosso is fresher: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Etna Rossotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Etna Rosso is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionEtna RossoMontepulciano d’Abruzzo
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smokeblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more