Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Etna Rosso vs Hawke’s Bay Syrah

How Etna Rosso and Hawke’s Bay Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more spice; Etna Rosso has more earthy character; Etna Rosso has more acidity.

Choose

Etna Rosso

Choose Etna Rosso if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something spicier, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Etna Rossolow (1/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Etna Rossotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)

Etna Rosso is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Etna Rossotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Etna Rosso is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Etna Rossotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Etna Rossotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionEtna RossoHawke’s Bay Syrah
Spicelow (1/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smokeblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plum

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more