Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Furmint vs Riesling

Both are made across the full range from bone-dry to intensely sweet, and both are famous for acidity — so which one does what.

The short answer

The main differences: Furmint has more body; Furmint has more oak influence; Riesling has more floral character.

Choose

Furmint

Choose Furmint if you want something fuller and richer, more oaky, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Riesling

Choose Riesling if you want something more floral, more aromatic.

Worth knowing

Riesling is the more aromatic and the more transparent; Furmint is broader, smokier and takes oak in a way Riesling generally does not. The sweet wines diverge completely: Tokaji Aszú gets its concentration from botrytised berries kneaded into a base wine, German sweet Riesling from botrytis or freezing without that step.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Furminttypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rieslingtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Furmint is fuller and richer: medium-plus against low-medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Furminttypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Rieslinglow (1/5)

Furmint is more oaky: medium against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Furmintlow (1/5)
Rieslingtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Riesling is more floral: medium against low.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Furminttypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rieslingtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Furmint is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against low-medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Furminttypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rieslingtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Furmint is stronger and warmer: medium against low-medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Furminttypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rieslingtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Riesling is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both medium.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both low.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionFurmintRiesling
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sweetnesstypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tanninlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at12–15°C8–11°C
Typical flavoursquince, green apple, lime, smoke, beeswaxlime, green apple, white peach, apricot, honey

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more