Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Langhe Nebbiolo vs Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

How Langhe Nebbiolo and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Langhe Nebbiolo and Montepulciano d’Abruzzo come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Langhe Nebbiolo has more floral character; Langhe Nebbiolo has more acidity; Langhe Nebbiolo has more earthy character.

Choose

Langhe Nebbiolo

Choose Langhe Nebbiolo if you want something more floral, fresher and more acidic, earthier.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Langhe Nebbiolo is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Langhe Nebbiolo is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)

Langhe Nebbiolo is earthier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Langhe Nebbiolo is fresher: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Langhe Nebbiolo is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both low-medium.

Full side by side

DimensionLanghe NebbioloMontepulciano d’Abruzzo
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, rose, raspberry, dried herbs, liquoriceblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more