Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Langhe Nebbiolo vs Naoussa Xinomavro

How Langhe Nebbiolo and Naoussa Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Naoussa Xinomavro has more tannin; Langhe Nebbiolo has more fruit intensity; Naoussa Xinomavro has more oak influence.

Choose

Langhe Nebbiolo

Choose Langhe Nebbiolo if you want something fruitier, more floral.

Choose

Naoussa Xinomavro

Choose Naoussa Xinomavro if you want something more tannic and structured, more oaky, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Langhe Nebbiolo is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Langhe Nebbiolo is more floral: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Langhe Nebbiolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionLanghe NebbioloNaoussa Xinomavro
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, rose, raspberry, dried herbs, liquoricesun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more