Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Late Bottled Vintage Port vs Port

How Late Bottled Vintage Port and Port differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Late Bottled Vintage Port and Port are both made from Touriga Nacional, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Port has more tannin.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Late Bottled Vintage Port

Choose Late Bottled Vintage Port if you prefer its flavour profile — black cherry, plum, chocolate.

Choose

Port

Choose Port if you want something more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Late Bottled Vintage Porttypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Porttypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Port is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.

Full side by side

DimensionLate Bottled Vintage PortPort
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Serve at15–18°C14–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, plum, chocolate, liquorice, dried figblack cherry, dried fig, chocolate, liquorice, walnut

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more