Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon vs Pinotage

How Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon and Pinotage differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Pinotage has more spice; Pinotage has more earthy character.

Choose

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fresher.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something spicier, earthier, sweeter.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Pinotagelow (1/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is earthier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Pinotagetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Pinotage is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Pinotage is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionMargaret River Cabernet SauvignonPinotage
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavourscassis, black cherry, bay leaf, graphite, cedarbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolate

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more