Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon vs Primitivo

How Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon and Primitivo differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Primitivo has more spice; Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fresher, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Primitivo

Choose Primitivo if you want something spicier, sweeter.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Primitivolow (1/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Primitivotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Primitivo is spicier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Primitivotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Primitivotypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Primitivo is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Primitivotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Primitivotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMargaret River Cabernet SauvignonPrimitivo
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavourscassis, black cherry, bay leaf, graphite, cedarblackberry jam, raisin, black cherry, liquorice, sweet spice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more