Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon vs Washington Syrah

How Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon and Washington Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Washington Syrah has more spice; Washington Syrah has more earthy character; Washington Syrah has more floral character.

Choose

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something spicier, earthier, more floral.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Washington Syrah is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahlow (1/5)

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Washington Syrah is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionMargaret River Cabernet SauvignonWashington Syrah
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourscassis, black cherry, bay leaf, graphite, cedarblackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more