Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Merlot vs Montepulciano

How Merlot and Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Merlot has more oak influence; Merlot has more herbal / green character; Merlot has more spice.

Choose

Merlot

Choose Merlot if you want something more oaky, more herbal and green, spicier.

Choose

Montepulciano

Choose Montepulciano if you prefer its flavour profile — black plum, blackberry, dried herbs.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Merlottypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulcianotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Merlot is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Merlottypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Merlot is more herbal and green: low-medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Merlottypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Merlot is spicier: low-medium against low.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionMerlotMontepulciano
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursplum, black cherry, chocolate, cedar, fruitcakeblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more