Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Merlot vs Nero d’Avola

How Merlot and Nero d’Avola differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Nero d’Avola has more acidity; Merlot has more herbal / green character; Nero d’Avola has more spice.

Choose

Merlot

Choose Merlot if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Nero d’Avola

Choose Nero d’Avola if you want something fresher and more acidic, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Merlottypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nero d’Avola is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Merlottypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)

Merlot is more herbal and green: low-medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Merlottypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nero d’Avola is spicier: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionMerlotNero d’Avola
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursplum, black cherry, chocolate, cedar, fruitcakeblack cherry, plum, liquorice, tobacco, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more