Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo vs New Zealand Pinot Noir

How Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and New Zealand Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: New Zealand Pinot Noir has more herbal / green character; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more spice; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more earthy character.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you prefer its flavour profile — black plum, blackberry, dried herbs.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulciano d’AbruzzoNew Zealand Pinot Noir
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoadark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clove

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more