Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo vs Rioja

How Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and Rioja differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Rioja has more oak influence; Rioja has more spice; Rioja has more earthy character.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something fruitier.

Choose

Rioja

Choose Rioja if you want something more oaky, spicier, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Riojatypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Rioja is more oaky: medium-plus against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Riojatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Riojatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Riojatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Riojatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Riojatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulciano d’AbruzzoRioja
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–18°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoared cherry, dried strawberry, vanilla, coconut, dill

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more