Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo vs Rioja Reserva

How Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and Rioja Reserva differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Rioja Reserva has more oak influence; Rioja Reserva has more spice; Rioja Reserva has more earthy character.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something fruitier.

Choose

Rioja Reserva

Choose Rioja Reserva if you want something more oaky, spicier, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja Reserva is more oaky: medium-plus against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja Reserva is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja Reserva is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja Reserva is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja Reserva is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulciano d’AbruzzoRioja Reserva
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoadried strawberry, leather, vanilla, tobacco, fig

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more