Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo vs Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

How Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more earthy character; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more acidity; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more floral character.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you want something fuller and richer.

Choose

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

Choose Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more floral.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more floral: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher: high against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulciano d’AbruzzoSonoma Coast Pinot Noir
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoared cherry, cranberry, forest floor, blood orange, sea spray

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more