Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo vs Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

How Montepulciano d’Abruzzo and Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more herbal / green character; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more spice; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more earthy character.

Choose

Montepulciano d’Abruzzo

Choose Montepulciano d’Abruzzo if you prefer its flavour profile — black plum, blackberry, dried herbs.

Choose

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

Choose Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzolow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Montepulciano d’Abruzzotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulciano d’AbruzzoSwartland Syrah and Rhône blends
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoablackberry, white pepper, fynbos, olive, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more