Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano vs Sangiovese

How Montepulciano and Sangiovese differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Montepulciano and Sangiovese come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Sangiovese has more acidity; Sangiovese has more herbal / green character; Sangiovese has more spice.

Choose

Montepulciano

Choose Montepulciano if you want something fruitier.

Choose

Sangiovese

Choose Sangiovese if you want something fresher and more acidic, more herbal and green, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sangiovesetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sangiovese is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Montepulcianolow (1/5)
Sangiovesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sangiovese is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Montepulcianolow (1/5)
Sangiovesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Sangiovese is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Montepulcianolow (1/5)
Sangiovesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sangiovese is earthier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sangiovesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Sangiovese is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sangiovesetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Montepulciano is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulcianoSangiovese
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoasour cherry, dried herbs, tomato leaf, leather, balsamic

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more