Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Montepulciano vs Zinfandel

How Montepulciano and Zinfandel differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Zinfandel has more spice; Zinfandel has more sweetness; Zinfandel has more alcohol.

Choose

Montepulciano

Choose Montepulciano if you want something more savoury.

Choose

Zinfandel

Choose Zinfandel if you want something spicier, sweeter, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Montepulcianolow (1/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Zinfandel is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Montepulcianolow (1/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Zinfandel is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Zinfandel is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Zinfandel is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Montepulcianotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Zinfandel is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Zinfandellow-medium (2/5)

Montepulciano is more savoury: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionMontepulcianoZinfandel
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoablackberry, raspberry jam, black pepper, cinnamon, raisin

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more