Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Morgon vs Southern Rhône blend

How Morgon and Southern Rhône blend differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Morgon and Southern Rhône blend come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Southern Rhône blend has more herbal / green character; Southern Rhône blend has more spice; Morgon has more acidity.

Choose

Morgon

Choose Morgon if you want something fresher and more acidic, more aromatic, fresher.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Morgonlow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Morgonlow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Morgon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendmedium (3/5)

Morgon is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Morgon is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Morgontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionMorgonSouthern Rhône blend
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)medium (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, kirsch, violet, earth, dried herbsred plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more