Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains vs Viognier

How Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains and Viognier differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Viognier has more body; Viognier has more spice; Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains has more perceived freshness.

Choose

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains

Choose Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains if you want something fresher, sweeter, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Viognier

Choose Viognier if you want something fuller and richer, spicier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grainstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Viogniertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Viognier is fuller and richer: high against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grainslow (1/5)
Viogniertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Viognier is spicier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grainstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Viogniertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grainstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Viogniertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Viognier is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grainstypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Viogniertypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains is sweeter: medium against low-medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grainstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Viogniertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Muscat Blanc à Petits Grains is fresher and more acidic: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both low.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both high.

Full side by side

DimensionMuscat Blanc à Petits GrainsViognier
Bodytypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesstypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencelow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Tanninlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)low-medium (2/5)
Floral charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at9–12°C12–15°C
Typical flavoursgrape, orange blossom, elderflower, peach, roseapricot, peach, honeysuckle, orange blossom, mango

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more