Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon vs Washington Syrah

How Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon and Washington Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon and Washington Syrah come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Washington Syrah has more earthy character; Washington Syrah has more floral character; Washington Syrah has more acidity.

Choose

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something earthier, more floral, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionNapa Valley Cabernet SauvignonWashington Syrah
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourscassis, black cherry, cocoa, vanilla, cedarblackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more