Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Nebbiolo vs Pinot Noir

Two pale, perfumed, ageworthy reds — and one of them will strip your gums.

The short answer

The main differences: Nebbiolo has more tannin; Nebbiolo has more acidity; Nebbiolo has more alcohol.

Choose

Nebbiolo

Choose Nebbiolo if you want something more tannic and structured, fresher and more acidic, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Pinot Noir

Choose Pinot Noir if you prefer its flavour profile — red cherry, raspberry, strawberry.

Worth knowing

They look alike in the glass and behave nothing alike in the mouth. Both are pale, aromatic and savoury with high acidity. Nebbiolo then adds some of the most formidable tannin in wine, which is why Barolo needs a decade and red Burgundy often does not.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Nebbiolo is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nebbiolo is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Nebbiolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nebbiolo is more aromatic: high against medium-plus.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Nebbiolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nebbiolo is more floral: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionNebbioloPinot Noir
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, dried herbs, trufflered cherry, raspberry, strawberry, forest floor, mushroom

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more