Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Nerello Mascalese vs Pinot Noir

Etna Rosso is compared to Burgundy so often that the comparison needs testing rather than repeating.

The short answer

The main differences: Pinot Noir has more spice; Nerello Mascalese has more acidity; Nerello Mascalese has more tannin.

Choose

Nerello Mascalese

Choose Nerello Mascalese if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Pinot Noir

Choose Pinot Noir if you want something spicier, more aromatic, more oaky.

Worth knowing

Pale colour, high acidity and a savoury, mineral character are genuinely shared. Nerello Mascalese is more tannic than most Pinot Noir and carries a volcanic, ashy quality Burgundy does not. It is also a child of Sangiovese, which is a fact about its genetics and not about its taste.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Nerello Mascaleselow (1/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Nerello Mascalesetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Nerello Mascalese is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Nerello Mascalese is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Nerello Mascalesetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Nerello Mascalese is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Nerello Mascalesemedium (3/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Pinot Noir is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Nerello Mascalesetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Floral character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNerello MascalesePinot Noir
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, dried orange peel, ash, wild herbs, smokered cherry, raspberry, strawberry, forest floor, mushroom

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more