Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Northern Rhône Syrah vs Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

How Northern Rhône Syrah and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Northern Rhône Syrah has more spice; Northern Rhône Syrah has more earthy character; Northern Rhône Syrah has more savoury character.

Choose

Northern Rhône Syrah

Choose Northern Rhône Syrah if you want something spicier, earthier, more savoury.

Choose

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is spicier: high against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is more savoury: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Northern Rhône Syrah is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Northern Rhône Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionNorthern Rhône SyrahSonoma Cabernet Sauvignon
Spicetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, green olive, bacon, violetblack cherry, cassis, cedar, vanilla, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more