Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

New Zealand Pinot Noir vs Hawke’s Bay Syrah

How New Zealand Pinot Noir and Hawke’s Bay Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

New Zealand Pinot Noir and Hawke’s Bay Syrah come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more floral character; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more herbal / green character; Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more spice.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something more herbal and green, earthier, fruitier.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something more floral, spicier, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

New Zealand Pinot Noirlow (1/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is earthier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNew Zealand Pinot NoirHawke’s Bay Syrah
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, cloveblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plum

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more