Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

New Zealand Pinot Noir vs Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

How New Zealand Pinot Noir and Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

New Zealand Pinot Noir and Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir are both made from Pinot Noir, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more floral character; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more herbal / green character; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more spice.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, fuller and richer.

Choose

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

Choose Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir if you want something more floral, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

New Zealand Pinot Noirlow (1/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNew Zealand Pinot NoirSonoma Coast Pinot Noir
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clovered cherry, cranberry, forest floor, blood orange, sea spray

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more