Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

New Zealand Pinot Noir vs Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

How New Zealand Pinot Noir and Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more tannin; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more fruit intensity; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more oak influence.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something fruitier, more oaky.

Choose

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

Choose Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends if you want something more tannic and structured, more herbal and green, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more herbal and green: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNew Zealand Pinot NoirSwartland Syrah and Rhône blends
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, cloveblackberry, white pepper, fynbos, olive, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more