Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

New Zealand Pinot Noir vs Southern Rhône blend

How New Zealand Pinot Noir and Southern Rhône blend differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: New Zealand Pinot Noir has more acidity; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more fruit intensity; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more oak influence.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something fresher and more acidic, fruitier, more oaky.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something more herbal and green, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is more herbal and green: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNew Zealand Pinot NoirSouthern Rhône blend
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clovered plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more