Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

New Zealand Pinot Noir vs Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

How New Zealand Pinot Noir and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: New Zealand Pinot Noir has more fruit intensity; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more herbal / green character; New Zealand Pinot Noir has more spice.

Choose

New Zealand Pinot Noir

Choose New Zealand Pinot Noir if you want something fruitier, more herbal and green, spicier.

Choose

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

Choose Vino Nobile di Montepulciano if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianolow (1/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

New Zealand Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

New Zealand Pinot Noir is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionNew Zealand Pinot NoirVino Nobile di Montepulciano
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursdark cherry, plum, thyme, violet, clovesour cherry, plum, dried herbs, leather, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more