Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Hawke’s Bay Syrah vs Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

How Hawke’s Bay Syrah and Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more spice; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more earthy character; Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir has more acidity.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something spicier, more tannic and structured, fuller and richer.

Choose

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir

Choose Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirlow (1/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Coast Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more floral: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionHawke’s Bay SyrahSonoma Coast Pinot Noir
Spicetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plumred cherry, cranberry, forest floor, blood orange, sea spray

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more