Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Hawke’s Bay Syrah vs Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

How Hawke’s Bay Syrah and Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Hawke’s Bay Syrah and Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends are both made from Syrah, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more floral character; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more herbal / green character; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more earthy character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something more floral, more oaky, spicier.

Choose

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

Choose Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends if you want something more herbal and green, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendslow (1/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionHawke’s Bay SyrahSwartland Syrah and Rhône blends
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plumblackberry, white pepper, fynbos, olive, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more