Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Hawke’s Bay Syrah vs Southern Rhône blend

How Hawke’s Bay Syrah and Southern Rhône blend differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Hawke’s Bay Syrah and Southern Rhône blend are both made from Syrah, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more floral character; Southern Rhône blend has more herbal / green character; Southern Rhône blend has more earthy character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something more floral, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something more herbal and green, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendlow (1/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Southern Rhône blend is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionHawke’s Bay SyrahSouthern Rhône blend
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plumred plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more