Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Pinotage vs Ribera del Duero

How Pinotage and Ribera del Duero differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Pinotage has more sweetness; Ribera del Duero has more body; Ribera del Duero has more savoury character.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something sweeter.

Choose

Ribera del Duero

Choose Ribera del Duero if you want something fuller and richer, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Pinotagetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Ribera del Duerolow (1/5)

Pinotage is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Ribera del Duerotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Ribera del Duero is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Ribera del Duerotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Ribera del Duero is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionPinotageRibera del Duero
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolateblackberry, black cherry, liquorice, vanilla, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more