Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Pinotage vs Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

How Pinotage and Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Pinotage and Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends has more herbal / green character; Pinotage has more spice; Pinotage has more sweetness.

Choose

Pinotage

Choose Pinotage if you want something spicier, sweeter, more oaky.

Choose

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

Choose Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends if you want something more herbal and green, more savoury, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Pinotagelow (1/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendslow (1/5)

Pinotage is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Pinotagetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendslow (1/5)

Pinotage is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Pinotagetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinotage is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Pinotagetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionPinotageStellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursbramble, plum, smoke, coffee, dark chocolateblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, fynbos, graphite

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more